Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

Important!

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 17:17 on 3 February 2025 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

User-reported

• 155.69.183.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Edit-warring by Singapore-based IP address in Rail transport in Malaysia, repeatedly adding claims potentially going against WP:SYNTH hundenvonPG (talk) 16:25, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

  I suggest the admin to look into the page history. The user (HundevonPenang) started edit warring despite we have invited him to the talk page for discussion. We have also added three sources from the government but was intentionally deleted by that user, when he just cited one source which obviously contains incorrect and speculative information. 155.69.183.1 (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

  1. Who started the reverts in the first place? Please see WP:3RR.

  2. As mentioned, your claims are not supported by any source, yet you have adamantly engaged in edit-warring despite the fact that your claims go against WP:SYNTH.

  3. Incorrect and speculative, to whom? You? hundenvonPG (talk) 16:43, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

  "intentionally deleted" - an accusation by said IP made in bad faith hundenvonPG (talk) 16:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

  Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

• 47.19.20.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently a vandalism-only account. Vandalism started in March 2019, in November of that year, it became a vandalism-only account with edits often being blanking and sometimes BLP vandalism. The user was blocked five times and warned 29 times (19 level 1 warnings, seven level 2 warnings, two level 3 warnings and one level 4 warning). He responded to these warnings with "no lol" or "booohoooo". RaschenTechner (talk) 17:16, 3 February 2025 (UTC)